A reference for decision-makers and technical teams

Evaluate the proposal and scope before committing to technology

A practical reference bringing together company identity and the scope, security, integration and handover questions institutional buyers need for a fair comparison.

Verifiable information

Business Field for Communications and Information Technology

Legal identity and official contact channels are kept in one place to support initial supplier qualification.

Commercial registration
7004290479
Headquarters
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Call us
+966 11 2033 999
Email
info@majal.sa
Six areas every proposal should answer

Six areas every proposal should answer

Procurement, IT and security teams can use these areas before comparison or approval.

Supplier identity

Legal name, commercial registration, headquarters and accountable contact channels.

Scope and assumptions

Functions, quantities, exclusions, dependencies and responsibilities.

Licensing and cost

Pricing unit, limits, renewal and separately priced items.

Security and data

Deployment, data categories, roles, retention, logging and backup.

Integration and acceptance

Interfaces, test environment, failure cases and acceptance criteria.

Handover and continuity

Training, documentation, support, export and contract exit.

What we publish clearly

What we publish clearly

Identity, product status, delivery methods, pricing factors, privacy and security reporting.

From procurement question to comparable proposal

  1. Share requirementsFunctions, volumes, data, integrations, security and target timing.
  2. Expose the gapsAssumptions, constraints and dependencies affecting cost and delivery.
  3. Document the answersScope, responsibilities, acceptance, handover and support.
  4. Compare on one basisThe decision rests on explicit elements, not an isolated headline price.

Clear boundaries before contract

Does this page mean every product holds one universal security certification?

No. Controls, documents and deployment are defined for the product, scope and entity.

Can requirements be reviewed before requesting a price?

Yes. Sharing security, integration and acceptance requirements early improves proposal comparability.

Do all products use the same deployment model?

No. The choice depends on the product, infrastructure, data, requirements and feasibility.

What happens when no suitable interface exists?

We document the constraint and assess a governed file exchange or an intermediate layer instead of making an unverified promise.

A clear first step

Discuss evaluation requirements

A practical reference bringing together company identity and the scope, security, integration and handover questions institutional buyers need for a fair comparison.